|
My attention was called to an ETM Group Discussion on WhatsApp. The text of one of these discussions was sent to me. It is all about one common topic; about preachers who do not say what William Branham said. Well, it did not come as a surprise to me that another preacher has joined the bandwagon of presumptuous views in the rumour mill world created by pharisaical ETM preachers. When an ETM Chat Group runs out of topics to discuss, they would often pick on ministers they deem heretics to peck on them like vultures. It is one thing for such discussion groups to pick on ministers and their teachings, but it is another thing to twist and lie about them. The preacher in charge of this particular discussion is an African, Caleb Nyoni, and his topic is “Richard Gan and others...heresy”. Dozens of ETM preachers and believers before him have already done what this preacher is now doing. And like many of them – and as I have often said – there is a lack of SINCERITY, being truthful in what is presented. Such evil lies deep in the subconscious mind of these people. They choose to make sweeping statements with subtle wordings to deceive their readers, that they are telling the truth. Their views about me and my teachings are twisted; not that they do not know, or that they are ignorant of them, it is just that they do not really care to read (or hear) to understand my teachings. Most of the time, they would simply glean through my teachings and grab whatever offends them or opposes their views. In so doing, and being prideful, they think they have understood my teachings. Such people do not really check for facts before they open their mouths. The majority, like this preacher in the Chat Group, do not even quote any statement of mine to support the accusations. All they have are quote after quotes of Bro. Branham to support their opinions; as well as in this African preacher’s accusations. Do they think they are doing God a service? They think they know what Branham meant when they quoted him word for word. (Did not those with such religious spirit in Jesus’ days quoted Him word for word but missed the Truth of what He meant?) Truly, without the baptism of the Holy Spirit, one cannot be led by Him into all Truth and what was to come. I do not have time to waste with this preacher’s accusations and lying words. His words will resound to him on the day of judgment. He, like the other accusers, should take heed to the words of Rev.22:15; 21:8. Please take notice of the highlighted texts that I have marked in three different colors(in the discussion text shown below) and reflect carefully what the preacher wrote:
*aqua
– subtle wordings that deceptively indoctrinate the readers, making
them to believe lies. Let me highlight an example (from the discussion) to show you the gravity of the preacher’s evil accusation, the evil assumption he has: He says this theopneustos inspiration is deeper than the ordinary inspiration on Brother Branham. By that Greek word he reduces bro Branham to an inferior new testament apostle and not in the same rank and file as old testament prophets. He is blind to the fact that bro Branham is Elijah with a higher commission and under a better covenant of the blood of Christ. Anyone who knows me and my teachings will disagree with this African preacher. Where have I ever taught such nonsense? In his paragraph of words, he already “maketh a lie” and is become a liar (cf. Rev22.15; 21:8). In another place, he reiterates that I have “tried by all means to reduce bro Branham to a mere ordinary prophet.” Did I? He is lying to his believers. Branham was a star-messenger in the right hand of Christ sent to the Seventh Church Age. Can anyone reduce him to “a mere ordinary prophet”??? Because this African preacher disagrees with the fact of what I said concerning the Sacred Scripture, he becomes presumptuous, committing presumptuous sin. My stand is that “All scripture is given by inspiration of God [Grk: theopneustos], and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:” (2Tim.3:16); that it is the only INBREATHED book for (the foundation of) our Faith. The Bible, the Written Word, is our ABSOLUTE, not Branham’s, not the Pope’s, not Luther’s, not anyone. All true servants of God who are anointed to preach, will minister the Truth of God under inspiration. But every word uttered are not “inbreathed” [Grk: theopneustos] as every word in the Sacred Scriptures are. That is the reason we are reminded by our Lord Himself to “Take heed what ye hear:...” (Mar.4:24), and “Take heed therefore how ye hear:...” (Luk.8:18). And also, how our Lord had rebuked Satan, saying “It is written...it is written”. Throughout the Bible, we can read in many places, these three words, “It is written”. Apparently, this African preacher does not know what to hear and how to hear; and he does not even know the importance of our Lord’s Written Word because he does not believe that the Bible is the final authority. All he knows is “Bro. Branham said...Bro. Branham said...Bro. Branham said”. That leads him to commit presumptuous sin. I wonder if he could be like King David, to do what is right. In his foolishness, he tries to justify Branham’s words to be as inspired (obviously to him, inbreathed of God) as the Sacred Scriptures; he said: The prophet was told by God that he was greater than all the old testament prophets because he was to reveal the entire Bible, how could he have less inspiration? That's the only Voice that can shepherd us right into the Rapture. Let us treasure that Voice! So, to this African preacher, Bro Branham has revealed THE ENTIRE BIBLE. I wonder where he got the “information” that God told Branham that he was greater than all the old prophets because he was to reveal the entire Bible. No wonder we have believers being led astray by such a cultic preacher into worshipping Branham as the ABSOLUTE, and that the Bible is no longer needed, save THE SPOKEN WORD books and tapes. Have such preachers ever consider that Branham himself said that the Bible was his ABSOLUTE, and that he often screamed out to get us back into the WORD of God (that is THE CHRIST)? If so, why are they getting into William Branham, instead of Christ? And is "the only Voice that can shepherd us right into the Rapture" the voice of Bro Branham? Or, the VOICE of the Spirit: “He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches” (Rev.3:22)? I wonder if this African preacher has an ear to hear the VOICE of the Holy Spirit. All ETM believers do hear a voice, the voice of William Branham, but not many hear THE VOICE of the Lord Jesus Christ. Truly, the Word of Jesus speaks of such believers:
Richard Gan ********************************************************************** Richard Gan and others...heresy Using again the principle of dissecting heretical persons who hide behind the end time message but actually being agents of darkness we look at Richard Gan and in passing refer to others. We are not analysing him as a person but his erroneous teachings. We saw very clearly how that jealous and greedy spirit seizes on these heretical leaders to a spot where they claim more than their share and elevate themselves to a position of Deity. It is very easy even at local church level to achieve such a status. Richard Gan a man from Singapore cannot escape the radar as he claims that before the rapture there will be 7 men to reveal the 7 thunders. He has a group of faceless 6 men whom he claims to be apostles and by inference them and he hold the mystery of the 7 thunders. According to him each of the 7 men will declare a Voice that will create rapturing faith. Such a job belongs to God alone and we see how that greedy spirit tries to steal from God his responsibilities. True to form of these heretics they always try to work on a seemingly unfulfilled scripture. Richard Gan does not believe the Seals were opened by Bro Branham's ministry because he believes the new testament order does not work by Amos 3:7 but by apostles in a collective and progressive revelation. *Absolute* Richard Gan refutes the fact that the message of Brother Branham is the absolute. Although he believes that the message carried an inferior form of inspiration as opposed to the old testament inspiration upon prophets which he calls *theopneustos* a Greek word meaning *inbreath* Such is the character of message scammers to use Greek words to hide their errors from unsuspecting message believers. Other cults like one led by Lee Vayle use the Greek word *Parousia* which means presence to declare that Christ has already come in 1963, thereby ignoring that he will come in a corporal body. Such is a Catholic spirit which hides behind Latin words in Communion and even the papal declaration Vicarivs filii dei is all in Latin to convey an error without people noticing its connotations. *Quote* *159 Well, it isn’t over…the Latin—the Latin words isn’t over the Vatican City; it’s over the throne of the pope, where he sits on his throne.* It’s wrote up there, *“VICARIVS FILII DEI.”* If you wish to, in the morning, I’ll bring it wrote out, everything, and put it on a piece of paper. And if you want it, why, I’ll bring it to you in the morning. Where you can spell it out in Roman letters, VICARIVS FILII DEI, *the word means “Instead of the Son of God”; he is the successor to the Son of God.* 54-0515 -
Questions And Answers *Comment* Jesus conveyed all his messages in simple common street language because he had no hidden agenda. The message scammers hide behind sophisticated Greek words which will confuse an ordinary grandmother.In those words are hidden agendas. *Quote* Jesus dressed just like the ordinary man out on the street. He walked right among men, and they didn’t even know Him. He didn’t dress any different. He didn’t dress like a priest or a Rabbi. He just dressed like the common man on the street. *What kind of a language did He use? Did He use real fine grammar? No. The Bible, if you… The truth is, the Bible was written so simple in the street language, until many of the translators get mixed up in it, in the words. That’s right. It was so simply written, just very simple*. That’s the type of a person… 54-0228E -
Looking For Jesus walking down the street? If He’s the same yesterday, today, and forever, He wouldn’t be dressed like that, ’cause He dressed like common men; walked among them, and they couldn’t tell Him from anybody else. That’s right. *And would we look for a man that used great big swelling words, that studied all day for great words to speak to their audience who doesn’t understand what they’re talking about? Certainly not. Jesus talked in such simple street language until today it’s got the translators confused. They don’t know how to take it, because the words that they speak on the street was so much different from their high classics, till it confuses them now*. 57-0104 -
Sirs, We Would See Jesus *Comment* From the quotes above, Christ the true doctrine giver, gave it in a simple layman language and using common parables until it is said "the common people heard him gladly." Mark 12:37 [37]David therefore himself calleth him Lord; and whence is he then his son? *And the common people heard him gladly.* *Quote* *He didn’t talk unknown language to the people, He spoke plain, everyday common language, ’cause the common people heard Him gladly. He wasn’t real educated, that—that’s the reason they can’t translate the Bible. They’re trying to bring it up into another category, when He spoke down here*. ```The worse place I ever needed an interpreter was in England. Those cockney speaking there yonder, they spoke; I didn’t know what they was talking about, speaking English…?…``` 56-0419 -
Earnestly Contending For The Faith That Was Once Delivered Unto The
Saints *Comment* The reason I am laying this down, is one once to cheat in a contract he will put part of the contract in a foreign language or hard to understand to confuse the contract. The lawyers are good at this.That's why they can win any case, they start confusing everybody with complicated language. A language can never bring revelation. All languages we have including Greek came out of a curse in Genesis 11.They need to be corrected in the new world. *Quote* And historically speaking this seems to be exactly right. And today our *Greek scholars say that the Greek language of Bible days is so perfect and exact* that if the student of the Greek is a refined and accurate grammarian he can truly know exactly what the New Testament Word teaches. *But is this not only a theory? Is this true? Is it not so that every Greek scholar of repute from one denomination debates another student of another denomination, and is it not so that their arguments are based on identical Greek words and identical rules of grammar? Certainly that is the way it is. Even back there in the Pergamean Age, just prior to the Nicene Council of 325 there were two great students, Arius and Athanasius who became locked in doctrinal combat over a Greek word. So intense and so world wide did their debate become that historians said the world was divided over a diphthong (the sound of two vowels in a single syllable). Now if the Greek is so perfect, and so ordained of God, why was there such a dispute? Surely God did not intend us all to know the Greek?* Right today we are having arguments over the Greek. Take for instance the book, “Christ’s Paralyzed Church X-rayed” by Dr. McCrossan. In it he sets forth numerous quotes from many renowned Greek grammarians, and proves to his own satisfaction that the unchanging rules of Greek grammar prove conclusively that the Bible teaches a man is baptized with the Holy Ghost subsequent to rebirth. He also states flatly that women can take over the pulpit because the word prophesy means to preach. *But has he convinced other students of the Greek who are as able as he? Never. All you have to do is read those students who hold the opposite view and hear their learned quotes*. An Exposition
Of The Seven Church Ages (1 - The Revelation Of Jesus Christ) *Comment* By the above quotation you cannot start a revival or revelation based on a language like Greek. The first scamming tactic used by Richard Gan is to use Greek word *theopneustos* to define inspiration called in breath quoting 2 Timothy 3. He says this theopneustos inspiration is deeper than the ordinary inspiration on Brother Branham. By that Greek word he reduces bro Branham to an inferior new testament apostle and not in the same rank and file as old testament prophets. He is blind to the fact that bro Branham is Elijah with a higher commission and under a better covenant of the blood of Christ. Speaking to brother Branham God said, *Quote* 121 And He said, “But that was the prophets of the Old Testament. *You’ve been called to be there in a much higher office than that.” He said, “You have more gifts besides that. You was called to pray for the sick and to preach the Gospel. And in the apostolic form, you know of—of greater things, many great gifts.”* 63-0623M -
Standing In The Gap *Comment* When bro Branham wanted to stay in the mountains and reduce his ministry God showed his high regard of him.....called to a higher office and gifted with many gifts than all prophets. Yet Richard Gan tried by all means to reduce bro Branham to a mere ordinary prophet. This is jealousy of the worst order. 2 Timothy 3:16 [16]All scripture is given by *inspiration* of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: *Comment* The prophet was told by God that he was greater than all the old testament prophets because he was to reveal the entire Bible, how could he have less inspiration? *Quote* 13 And now if the Old Testament had to be drove from the…the writer had to be drove from his people, into the wilderness, *to get inspiration to write the Old Testament. And in the New Testament, the writer was drove by the Author, into a desert place, to get the inspiration to write the New Testament. And the Books are sealed with Seven Seals; it would also require the same, I believe, in these days, to open those Seven Seals*. 65-1121 -
What House Will You Build Me? *Comment* By the quote above the writer of the Old testament Moses was inspired in the deserts to write its books, and the writer of the new testament Paul needed the same inspiration, then the opening of the Seals that opened up the entire Bible required the same inspiration. Then where is the talk of *theopneustos*, its only a language ploy to reduce brother Branham so that he Richard Gan and his special apostles can add further light. He claims the message is incomplete and needs further light. Richard Gan calls message believers Branhamites just because they take the tapes and books as final. He claims that the Bible is the final authority.Kacou Phillip on the other hand says the Bible is not the ultimate but his book which he has written. Both men are the same in that they remove the message as the final authority. We will deal with this scheme later. Its so cunning. It hates people that quote the message. Yet the same guys want their videos listened to in YouTube, they want their sermons listened to on tape or otherwise. They print literature that they send to their cults....all in all, they want to hush the Voice of God from the people. *Quote* But, God, in the days of the old prophets, in the midst of everything, like He did in the garden of Eden, when the true Voice of God and the true worship of God was condemned, and sent out and killed, in the garden of Eden, *and the Voice of God hushed by the greed and jealousy, it’s been that way in the church ever since, trying to hush the true Voice of God*. 61-0402 -
The True Easter Seal *Comment* The cult leaders want preeminence through greed and they don't want any credit to go to William Branham.But all the same he is the voice of God to the Bride. *Quote* *But when the Angel of the Lord moves down, It becomes, then, a Voice of God to you*. Maybe it… If I offended you by saying that, forgive me. But I felt that might been resented. *But I am God’s Voice to you. See? I say that again. That time was under inspiration*. See? And I—I felt bad about it the first time, but It repeated it. 51-0505 - My
Commission *Comment* Under
inspiration, the prophet declared that he was the Voice of God to
us.Guys like Richard Gan believe that
the new testament order is for apostles to receive revelation
collectively.He therefore disqualifies bro Branham as the sole
revealer of the mysteries of God in the last days.Dathan and
Korah said about Moses, *Comment* Out of jealousy they wanted to be involved also, they didn't want a one man leadership. *Quote* Before we close this section on the messenger of the Laodicean Age, we must seriously consider these two thoughts. *First, this age will have ONE Prophet-Messenger. Revelation 10:7 says, “When he (singular) shall begin to sound.*” ```There has never been an age where God gave His people two major prophets at one time. He gave Enoch (alone); He gave Noah (alone); He gave Moses (he alone had the Word though others prophesied); John the Baptist came ALONE. Now in this last day there is to be a PROPHET (not a prophetess — though in this age there are more women purporting to give God’s revelation than men), and the infallible Word says that he (the prophet) will reveal the mysteries to the end-time people, and turn the hearts of the children back to the fathers```. *There are those who say that God’s people are going to come together through a collective revelation. I challenge that statement. It is a bald, invalid assumption in the face of Revelation 10:7*. Now I do not deny that people will prophesy in this last age and their ministries can and will be correct. I do not deny that there will be prophets even as in the days of Paul when there was “one, Agabus, a prophet who prophesied of a famine.” I agree that is so. *BUT I DENY UPON THE INFALLIBLE EVIDENCE OF THE WORD THAT THERE IS MORE THAN ONE MAJOR PROPHET-MESSENGER WHO WILL REVEAL THE MYSTERIES AS CONTAINED IN THE WORD, AND WHO HAS THE MINISTRY TO TURN THE HEARTS OF THE CHILDREN TO THE FATHERS. “Thus saith the Lord” by His unfailing Word stands, and shall stand and be vindicated*. There is one prophet-messenger to this age. On the basis of human behavior alone, anyone knows that where there are many people there is even divided opinion on lesser points of a major doctrine which they all hold together. Who then will have the power of infallibility which is to be restored in this last age, for this last age is going to go back to manifesting the Pure Word Bride? That means we will have the Word once again as it was perfectly given, and perfectly understood in the days of Paul. I will tell you who will have it. It will be a prophet as thoroughly vindicated, or even more thoroughly vindicated than was any prophet in all the ages from Enoch to this day, because this man will of necessity have the capstone prophetic ministry, and God will shew him forth. He won’t need to speak for himself, God will speak for him by the voice of the sign. Amen. An Exposition
Of The Seven Church Ages (9 - The Laodicean Church Age) *Comment* By the statement above Richard Gan's collective revelation of seven apostles to reveal the seven thunders is dumped altogether into the dustbin. There is only ONE messenger of Rev10:7 who will reveal the 7 Seals.That was fulfilled by William Branham. Such a statement to involve 7 men in future to reveal the 7 Seals is erroneous. *Language scam number 2* Another scamming tactic used by Richard Gan by his false and cunning arguments is the Greek words *Rhema* and *Logos* 2 Peter 2:3 *[3]And in their covetousness (lust, greed) they will exploit you with false (cunning) arguments*. From of old the sentence [of condemnation] for them has not been idle; their destruction (eternal misery) has not been asleep. *Comment* Again in another veiled attack on the message Richard Gan divides the Word into 2 sections, just like he divided inspiration into deep one on the old testament prophets (theopneustos) and a shallow inspiration on Bro Branham. Preying on the simple minds he says in Greek the *Word* is in 2 parts. *RHEMA* which means the Word you hear and *LOGOS* which is the concept or thought. In there he accuses message believers of possessing RHEMA and not the LOGOS. In other words he says believers of bro Branham don't have a revelation but are just reciters of the message . The cunning part is that it means he has the LOGOS or concept of the message. Such a disposition makes him an authority then. This is fallacy, the prophet said the Word is in the bride as it was in Mary and she knows what to do with the Word. Such a setup leaves him with the authority to know the depth of the Logos as versus just parroting the words of Bro Branham. Such a step is dangerous because his claimed logos depth is mere theology coupled with educated guesses. *Examples* Richard Gan claims that the sepernt seed crossed through the ark via Mrs Noah. He claims Noah's wife was serpent seed and related to Lamech's wives. He claims that Ham had a sexual act with Noah's wife and produced Canaan. He claims that's why Canaan was cursed. Such a statement is false because neither does the Bible and message says so. The prophet points out that serpent seed crossed over through Ham's wife and not Noah's wife. We can go on and on with this man's wild deviations from scripture ..we would never end. *Correction* To despise tapes and tape teaching is anti- Christ. There is no other vindicated voice outside of William Branham in this day. I will humbly go to quotations to show that the tapes and books by William Branham is our absolute. Before I do that let me quote Richard Gan, and you will see how he hates the message. He doesn't want it to be absolute, he is greedy and wants a part to control. These are his words: "We thank God for Bro Branham. But we need to get back to the ABSOLUTE to find our place and our faith in those pages of the Holy Script." *Comment* Those words look beautiful but there is a diabolical inference to say bro Branham's sermons need to be examined by the Bible. Gan forgets that the same God who wrote the Bible was behind the Voice of bro Branham to interpret the same Bible. Richard Gan goes on to say: " It's another thing to listen or read Bro Branham's words, it is another to know where the Truth lies in those pages of the Scripture. Otherwise we don't have a foundation." *Comment* If bro Branham's words were incomplete why is it that those in the 6th dimension were resting for their acception into the rapture on bro Branham's sermons. Any minister, pastor , bishop who exercises any excessive authority on people and not allowing the tapes and books to have authority is anointed of the same cult spirit. People now want to assume bishop status and overrun other smaller ministries... This is unscriptural. Any church however small has its own sovreignity. Tapes and books...final authority. *Quote* 106 So, now, listen to every Word. Catch It. And—and if you’re taking It on tapes, or anything, then you stay right with that tape Teaching. *Don’t say nothing but what that tape says. Just say just exactly what the tape says. See? Now, because, some of those things, we’re going to understand a whole lot about this now, why It’s misunderstood. See? And you be sure, just say just what the tape says. Don’t say nothing else. See? Cause, I don’t say That of my own. It’s Him that says It, you see*. And so many times, confusion, people raise up and say, “Well, So-and-so said It meant so-and-so.” Just—just leave It the way It is. 107 See, that’s the way we want the Bible. Just the way the Bible says It, that’s the way we want It, just—just like That. *Don’t put own interpretation to It. It’s already interpreted, you see. Now*: 63-0317M -
God Hiding Himself In Simplicity, Then Revealing Himself In The Same *Comment* According to the above it is very clear we should not interpret the message because its already interpreted, we should just say what the tapes says. *Quote* And about a week ago, in—in Jamaica, where I was missionarying…*We send tapes all over the world. And The Seven Seals has got back into…way back into the inlands of Jamaica, way in the interior*. And it’s very primitive back in there, behind Blue Mountain. And the natives, sometimes, they have a—a tape recorder we get for them, that you have to—to, like the old Victrola, crank it, and then let—let it play like that. Then, every few minutes, somebody has to crank it. 24 This group had a—a little battery, six-volt battery, or something another, playing the tape recorder. And they—they was all setting together, about what is here tonight, listening to those Seals, I believe it was. *And while I was speaking, they noticed, coming in the room, came that same Pillar of Fire, moved over where the tape recorder was and settled down over the top of it. And they went and got a camera and took the picture of It. And just the same One, there It is, hanging right there over it. Now we’re getting it blowed up, so we can put it on the—the billboard out there, that you can see it*. 63-0717 - A
Prisoner *Comment* While the believers were listening to the prophet's words the pillar of fire was so happy he descending over that tape as a sign of approval. So the voice on tape can bring the pillar of fire down. *Quote* But that sixth one’s right. If you want… There’s a little fellow here tonight. I don’t know whether Charlie Cox is here or not. I was talking to him on the sixth sense. He took that, and believed it, and played it on a tape. [Blank spot on tape—Ed.] *His wife said, “Let me play it.” Run in the other room and she started playing it. She said, “Lord, I’ve got a sixth sense too, and I’m going to put it to work. I want the Holy Ghost,” and here It come*. What is it? If you believe it. Seeing… We should believe it without any seeing. But yet God lets us see it anyhow. He shows it to us. He shows us His—His Presence. Surely then there’d be no excuse that that sixth sense won’t go to work. Let us bow our heads. 60-0611E -
Faith Is The Sixth Sense *Comment* By the quote above Sister Cox listening to a tape received the Holy Ghost. Then where does Richard Gan stand by saying our foundation is in the Holy Script and not words of William Branham. The same Holy Script is what promised and produced bro Branham. *Quote* 3 I think it would be a good thing, Brother Neville, if them brethren, all you pastors, and so forth, that we might come together. That way we can speak the same thing, everywhere, you see, we know. *And then that will be taped, also, our questions and our answers will be taped, and each one may have a tape, so that you might know, to play back, in case of anything, any question coming up, that might be a benefit to the church. Or someone would say, “Well, this.” We’ll go back and see what is on the tape, it said. We have tapes of that nature, already*. And now we got new trustees, I think, this year, and—and some new deacons, and so forth, and we like to get them instructed on that. 60-1225 -
God's Wrapped Gift *Comment* For uniformity the prophet admonishes us to come back and listen to the tape if any question arises. *Quote* *10 Now straight to the…And I would ask, that if ever a time that any of these things come into question, that this tape may be played before the members of this church, see, at your meetings, or prior the meeting, just before the meeting start. Turn this tape on and play it!* And may the congregation here understand that these men are duty bound to God, as their oath in this church, to help hold these principles. You may disagree with them; and if I let you run it, then I’ll disagree with you. *We’ve got to have some source somewhere where there’s got to be an ultimate. And the best that I know, I’m giving it under the Holy Spirit, letting Him be my Ultimate. And let this tape be your ultimate on these questions*. 63-1226 -
Church Order *Comment* By the quote above bro Branham left the tapes as the ultimate. But we do we see, Edgar Roscoe has his own literature claiming a better revelation on the baptism of the Holy Ghost than what bro Branham had. Bruce Dalton has volumes and volumes of books whereby he humiliates all popular ministries and he claims to carry the Trumpet Voice which will lead the bride into the rapture. His friend Lambert he claims carries the Voice of the Archangel. Kacou Phillip has his own bible written by himself, Richard Gan has his own literature which he sends to his cult members. Lee Vayle has literature on Godhead and Parousia...the list goes on. In the midst of all that we have one true Voice on tape and book and its the voice of God. The elect will take their final authority from the tapes and books no matter what cult rises up. *Quote* *(and I know you realize that this tape is being made, will play in every nation under the heavens, about, around the world); and some of you peoples who is here, present; and some of you out where the tapes will be played in the other nations (by an interpreter giving it to the tribes of Africa, back in the Hottentots, and—and all around)*; and to you religious leaders who just got an education of the Bible: 62-1230M -
Absolute *Comment* Bro Branham prophesied that tapes of his messages will be played and even interpreted into local languages for the common people to hear gladly. *Conclusion* For discrediting the words of the end time prophet and yet exalting his unfounded revelations we declare Richard Gan's position as unfortunate and not worthy to be honored by anyone desiring to be in heaven. We encourage tape teaching and discourage motivational preachings of prosperity gospel that has littered the You tube world.We discourage all the sects that try to run down our prophet William Branham.He that receives a prophet in the name of a prophet shall receive a prophet's reward. The true voice that corrected the bride getting out of step was not Ewald Frank, Richard Gan. Bruce Dalton, Lambert, Edgar Roscoe, Lee Vayle or any bishop it was the Voice of the 7th angel....William Branham. *Quote* I noticed one of them trying, two or three of them trying, getting out of line. *I screamed, “Stay in line!” And the vision left me. And I was standing in the room, screaming, “Stay in line!*” Line, That. 65-1204 -
The Rapture *Comment* That's the the only Voice that can shepherd us right into the Rapture. Let us treasure that Voice! Shalom. |
|
Just Believe: Do we just believe even if we do not understand? |